Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Scientometric analysis of anthropology in the Republic of Croatia for the period of 1980-1996 (CROSBI ID 78750)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Bencetić Klaić, Zvjezdana ; Klaić, Branimir Scientometric analysis of anthropology in the Republic of Croatia for the period of 1980-1996 // Collegium antropologicum, 21 (1997), 1; 301-318

Podaci o odgovornosti

Bencetić Klaić, Zvjezdana ; Klaić, Branimir

engleski

Scientometric analysis of anthropology in the Republic of Croatia for the period of 1980-1996

In the period from 1980-1996, anthropologists from the Republic of Croatia published 254 scientific papers that are included in the secondary publication Social Science Citation Index. Scientists working in the scientific subfield anthropology participate with approximately 2% in the overall scientific output of the Republic of Croatia. Thirty-six international articles were published (14.2% of the total number), while the remaining 218 papers were published solely by d! omestic authors. An average anthropological paper was published by 3.06 authors, and approximately one-third of all articles by a single author. The major part of scientific papers (237 articles or 93.3%) by Croatian anthropologists were published in the domestic primary scientific journal Collegium antropologicum. All scientific papers together obtained 380 citations or 1.5 citations per article. The citation of articles is approximately 60% above the expected average for the respective journal. Published international papers had 6.6 citations, while articles by domestic authors had 0.65 citations per paper. Anthropological scientific papers obtained 154 independent citations and participate with 40.5% in the total number of citations. In the first five years after publishing, 166 articles (65.4% of the total number) were not cited, while the world average for the scientific subfield anthropology was greater, 79.5% uncited articles. Only 19.4% of! international papers and 72.9% of domestic papers were not cited in this five-year period. Based on scientometric indicators of the scientific output, that is, the number of published papers, the partial scientific contribution, i.e., partial authorship, and scientific influence, i.e. the number of citations, a method for the evaluation of scientific papers and their authors is suggested in this paper.

anthropology ; scientometric indicator

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

21 (1)

1997.

301-318

objavljeno

0350-6134

1848-9486

Povezanost rada

Geologija, Kemija

Indeksiranost