Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Informal coercion in psychiatry : a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries (CROSBI ID 217466)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Valenti, Emanuele ; Banks, Ciara ; Calcedo-Barba, Alfredo ; Bensimon, Cécile M. ; Hoffmann, Karin-Maria ; Pelto-Piri, Veikko ; Jurin, Tanja ; Mendoza, Octavio Márquez ; Mundt, Adrian P. ; Rugkåsa, Jorun et al. Informal coercion in psychiatry : a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries // Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 50 (2015), 8; 1297-1308. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1032-3

Podaci o odgovornosti

Valenti, Emanuele ; Banks, Ciara ; Calcedo-Barba, Alfredo ; Bensimon, Cécile M. ; Hoffmann, Karin-Maria ; Pelto-Piri, Veikko ; Jurin, Tanja ; Mendoza, Octavio Márquez ; Mundt, Adrian P. ; Rugkåsa, Jorun ; Tubini, Jacopo ; Priebe, Stefan

engleski

Informal coercion in psychiatry : a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries

Purpose Whilst formal coercion in psychiatry is regulated by legislation, other interventions that are often referred to as informal coercion are less regulated. It remains unclear to what extent these interventions are, and how they are used, in mental healthcare. This paper aims to identify the attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals towards the use of informal coercion across countries with differing sociocultural contexts. Method Focus groups with mental health professionals were conducted in ten countries with different sociocultural contexts (Canada, Chile, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom). Results Five common themes were identified: (a) a belief that informal coercion is effective ; (b) an often uncomfortable feeling using it ; (c) an explicit as well as (d) implicit dissonance between attitudes and practice—with wider use of informal coercion than is thought right in theory ; (e) a link to principles of paternalism and responsibility versus respect for the patient’s autonomy. Conclusions A disapproval of informal coercion in theory is often overridden in practice. This dissonance occurs across different sociocultural contexts, tends to make professionals feel uneasy, and requires more debate and guidance.

autonomy;  ethics; international comparison;  paternalism;

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

50 (8)

2015.

1297-1308

objavljeno

0933-7954

10.1007/s00127-015-1032-3

Povezanost rada

Psihologija

Poveznice
Indeksiranost