Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

The Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients with Drug-Induced Hyposalivation: A Pilot Study (CROSBI ID 230441)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Terlević Dabić, Dijana ; Jurišić, Sanja ; Vučićević Boras, Vanja ; Gabrić, Dragana ; Bago, Ivona ; Vrdoljak Velimir, Danko The Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients with Drug-Induced Hyposalivation: A Pilot Study // Photomedicine and laser surgery, 34 (2016), 9; 389-393. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4109

Podaci o odgovornosti

Terlević Dabić, Dijana ; Jurišić, Sanja ; Vučićević Boras, Vanja ; Gabrić, Dragana ; Bago, Ivona ; Vrdoljak Velimir, Danko

engleski

The Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients with Drug-Induced Hyposalivation: A Pilot Study

The aim of this study was to compare switched on and switched off (sham) low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of drug- induced hyposalivation. Hyposalivation is decreased salivary flow rate most frequently present in patients who take a lot of medication, suffer from Sjögren's syndrome, or were irradiated. Available therapies provide only short-term relief. Forty-three participants (40 females and 3 males, average age 72.3 ±  8.9) participated in the study. Before therapy or after therapy, every participant fulfilled quality-of-life assessment scale (OHIP- CRO14). Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were measured before and after treatment. The LLLT was performed by the use of gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs) laser (830 nm) on parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands every day except during weekends for 14 days. Significant difference in unstimulated salivary flow rate after the treatment was found in the study group (p = 0.002) compared with the sham group. No significant difference in stimulated salivary flow rate after treatment was found in the laser group (p =  0.626) nor in the sham laser group (p = 0.233). No significant difference in patient's quality- of-life score was found after both treatments. The results of this study showed that the LLLT increased unstimulated salivary flow rate significantly. However, stimulated salivary flow rate did not increase significantly after the LLLT. In patients who underwent sham laser therapy, neither unstimulated nor stimulated salivary flow rate increased significantly.

laser therapy ; LLLT ; hyposalivation

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

34 (9)

2016.

389-393

objavljeno

1549-5418

10.1089/pho.2016.4109

Povezanost rada

Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Dentalna medicina

Poveznice
Indeksiranost