Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

The effect of user-defined parameters on DTM accuracy—development of a hybrid model (CROSBI ID 254849)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Šiljeg, Ante ; Barada, Mirko ; Marić, Ivan ; Roland, Vlatko The effect of user-defined parameters on DTM accuracy—development of a hybrid model // Applied geomatics, 10 (2018), 7; 1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12518-018-0243-1

Podaci o odgovornosti

Šiljeg, Ante ; Barada, Mirko ; Marić, Ivan ; Roland, Vlatko

engleski

The effect of user-defined parameters on DTM accuracy—development of a hybrid model

User-defined parameters (point density, interpolation, and pixel size) have a great influence on the accuracy of digital terrain model (DTM). Therefore, the optimal interpolation method (IM) and appropriate pixel size should be used to create a continuous surface. Pixel size or spatial resolution tends to be a compromise between the number of samples and the size of the study area, whereby input dataset is often devaluated. In this paper, the authors propose a new methodological approach to DTM production (hybrid DTM—HDTM) from an aero-photogrammetry dataset. Two different approaches to DTM production are presented: the usual (UDTM) and the hybrid (HDTM). HDTM is based on restructuring and refining the input dataset by generating contour lines, determining the optimal interpolation method and selecting the appropriate spatial resolution. The goal is to develop a qualitative DTM while minimalizing the devaluation of input data and error propagation. The accuracy of different IMs for UDTM was examined in a comparative analysis of six statistical parameters by applying cross- validation, with the focus on the root mean square error (RMSE) parameter. Four different methods of selecting optimal spatial resolution were tested for the same model. The UDTM and HDTM generated were compared by interior, exterior, and visual accuracy assessment and by the performance success of specific hydrological parameters: (1) flow accumulation— by applying a developed DNA concept and (2) watershed—by calculating volume and 3D surface. The reference value for exterior accuracy assessment was high-resolution airborne LiDAR DTM (LDTM). It was found that ordinary kriging (OK) was the best IM (RMSE, 1.9893 m). The spatial resolution of UDTM was calculated by combining two variants of the point pattern analysis method and was found to be 19 m. On the other hand, the complexity of terrain method was used to define the spatial resolution of HDTM (3 m). HDTM achieved better results than UDTM in all aspects of accuracy assessment. The exterior accuracy of HDTM was better by 1.483 m (RMSE). Finally, the results of the applied DNA concept showed that a stream generated from HDTM had a 2.587 m lower horizontal root mean square error (HRMSE) than the stream generated from UDTM.

DTM accuracy, Sampling method, Pixel size, Spatial interpolation, Hybrid DTM

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

10 (7)

2018.

1-16

objavljeno

1866-9298

1866-928X

10.1007/s12518-018-0243-1

Povezanost rada

Geodezija, Geografija, Interdisciplinarne prirodne znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost